From ab00b6d5a2e394ba08a53d073c7e862980df09d6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bastien Montagne <montagne29@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 15:00:20 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] More FBX fixes regarding UV/textures, found while
investigating a potential issue with mifth on IRC: handling of default empty
texture (when there are none real texture to export) was rather
fuzzy/inconsistent.
Note: not to be backported, not 100% sure this is now correct, and not a regression anyway.
---
io_scene_fbx/export_fbx.py | 31 +++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/io_scene_fbx/export_fbx.py b/io_scene_fbx/export_fbx.py
index edc21692c..004d4ade1 100644
--- a/io_scene_fbx/export_fbx.py
+++ b/io_scene_fbx/export_fbx.py
@@ -1585,16 +1585,17 @@ def save_single(operator, scene, filepath="",
t_pi = (d.image for d in uvtexture.data) # Can't use foreach_get here :(
fw(',\n\t\t\t '.join(','.join('%d' % tex2idx[i] for i in chunk)
for chunk in grouper_exact(t_pi, _nchunk_idx)))
- else:
- fw('\n\t\tLayerElementTexture: 0 {'
- '\n\t\t\tVersion: 101'
- '\n\t\t\tName: ""'
- '\n\t\t\tMappingInformationType: "NoMappingInformation"'
- '\n\t\t\tReferenceInformationType: "IndexToDirect"'
- '\n\t\t\tBlendMode: "Translucent"'
- '\n\t\t\tTextureAlpha: 1'
- '\n\t\t\tTextureId: ')
- fw('\n\t\t}')
+ fw('\n\t\t}')
+ if not do_textures:
+ fw('\n\t\tLayerElementTexture: 0 {'
+ '\n\t\t\tVersion: 101'
+ '\n\t\t\tName: ""'
+ '\n\t\t\tMappingInformationType: "NoMappingInformation"'
+ '\n\t\t\tReferenceInformationType: "IndexToDirect"'
+ '\n\t\t\tBlendMode: "Translucent"'
+ '\n\t\t\tTextureAlpha: 1'
+ '\n\t\t\tTextureId: '
+ '\n\t\t}')
del t_uv
del t_pi
@@ -1652,7 +1653,8 @@ def save_single(operator, scene, filepath="",
'\n\t\t\t}')
# Always write this
- if do_textures:
+ #if do_textures:
+ if True:
fw('\n\t\t\tLayerElement: {'
'\n\t\t\t\tType: "LayerElementTexture"'
'\n\t\t\t\tTypedIndex: 0'
@@ -1667,7 +1669,7 @@ def save_single(operator, scene, filepath="",
fw('\n\t\t}')
if len(uvlayers) > 1:
- for i in range(1, len(uvlayers)): # Why start at 1 (i.e. skip first UV layer)??? --mont29
+ for i in range(1, len(uvlayers)):
fw('\n\t\tLayer: %d {'
'\n\t\t\tVersion: 100'
'\n\t\t\tLayerElement: {'
@@ -1679,6 +1681,11 @@ def save_single(operator, scene, filepath="",
'\n\t\t\t\tType: "LayerElementTexture"'
'\n\t\t\t\tTypedIndex: %d'
'\n\t\t\t}' % i)
+ else:
+ fw('\n\t\t\tLayerElement: {'
+ '\n\t\t\t\tType: "LayerElementTexture"'
+ '\n\t\t\t\tTypedIndex: 0'
+ '\n\t\t\t}')
fw('\n\t\t}')
# XXX Col layers are written before UV ones above, why adding them after UV here???
--
GitLab